|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rivr Luzade
Kenshin.
DARKNESS.
3023
   |
Posted - 2017.05.05 15:04:10 -
[1] - Quote
Bjorn Tyrson wrote:There is nothing currently that teaches you the basic skills for carrier use, besides using a carrier. and fighters use quite different mechanics from drones.
And why should there? Isn't your low sec in Solitude or Syndicate null sec campus the best test environment to figure these things out? Why should this testing phase be possible to do in high sec?
UI Improvement Collective
My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
|
Rivr Luzade
Kenshin.
DARKNESS.
3024
|
Posted - 2017.05.05 19:36:49 -
[2] - Quote
Basics? A Dread uses fuel to start their siege, a Marauder does not. A carrier uses fighters, which are improved drones, and the ships are about managing and assigning drones to targets. Any drone boat teaches you the basics about how you use and manage drones/fighters.
UI Improvement Collective
My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
|
Rivr Luzade
Kenshin.
DARKNESS.
3032
|
Posted - 2017.05.11 13:59:37 -
[3] - Quote
One way or another, capital ships and fighters are not needed in High sec and no whatsoever warped training purpose to "learn fighter mechanics" make capitals or either overpowered or useless ships more plausible.
UI Improvement Collective
My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
|
Rivr Luzade
Kenshin.
DARKNESS.
3032
|
Posted - 2017.05.12 05:33:18 -
[4] - Quote
Unseen Spectre wrote:It is a matter of diversity.
And here you got this wrong: High sec does not need this diversity. This diversity is one of the pushing factors that makes people want to leave High sec in order to experience more of the game. Removing these pushing factors just to please some afraid people's desires is not a good justification to implement such a broken and unnecessary feature.
UI Improvement Collective
My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
|
Rivr Luzade
Kenshin.
DARKNESS.
3032
|
Posted - 2017.05.12 14:50:11 -
[5] - Quote
These ships won't get killed by CONCORD if a war is raging. Instead of having to risk expensive tackle ships on gate where people can actually fight back and create surprises, they can just have these ships at extreme range with the fighters orbiting the gate while cheap tackle grabs the target.
UI Improvement Collective
My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
|
|
|
| |
|